How Human face came to be

Author : Wahid Ahmad

×

Share this Post:


One of the key features that differentiates us from other hominins is our face. The human face is a marvel of evolution, a canvas painted with myriad expressions, and a reflection of our shared history and individual identity. Welcome to Anthromedia, in this video we will explore the evolution of the human face over the last 4 million years. Before we proceed don’t forget to subscribe.

The human face is a complex skeletal structure formed by 14 bones housing parts of various systems. To understand the evolutionary changes leading to the modern human face, we will look at extinct hominin taxa over the past 4 million years from Ardipithecus to recent hominins.

Chimpanzees, bonobos, and gorillas have distinct facial characteristics, such as a bony arch above the eyes that protrudes prominently, separating the facial mask from the braincase. In contrast, early hominins like Australopithecus show weaker differentiation between the supraorbital structures above the eyes and the braincase.

These differences may be related to both social display mechanisms and biomechanical performance, with the latter being more important. Among non-human African great apes, postnatal growth results in a long, vertically deep snout with a forward-projecting premaxilla, creating a gap between lateral incisors and canines. Early hominins, including modern humans, exhibit a shorter midface with a more vertical profile.

From Early Hominins

The way early hominin faces developed involved independent changes in the upper jaw, maxillary and front part of the upper jaw called premaxillary. The amount the face sticks out called prognathism varies due to different growth patterns and bone changes. The evolved facial features in early hominins happened because the base of the skull shortened, and the size of canine teeth reduced.

Ardipithecus ramidus and Australopithecus, our ancient relatives from about 4.4 to 3 million years ago, had faces that looked different from both modern humans and African great apes.

Ardipithecus ramidus had a face with short, light cheekbones like chimpanzees, while Australopithecus afarensis, including the famous Lucy, had broad and robust cheekbones. Despite these differences, they shared some features with later hominins, like us.

Common features included a short upper jaw, a reduced midface, and supraorbital structures integrated with the braincase. They also had shorter skulls, less sexual dimorphism in canine teeth and smaller incisors.

However, when it came to the parts of the face related to chewing, there were distinctions. Australopithecus afarensis had a robust chewing system, indicated by large cheekbones and strong arches, suggesting they had a diverse diet. On the other hand, Ardipithecus ramidus had a face more similar to chimpanzees, with vertically short and lightly built cheekbones and arches.

These facial differences suggest that our early human relatives went through evolutionary changes in different parts of the face. Initially, changes focused on the central and upper face, possibly for social signaling. Later changes were more about adapting the chewing system to different diets.

Australopithecus species, including those classified as Paranthropus, have distinct features in their faces adapted for chewing tough plant foods, especially during arid conditions around 2.8-2.7 million years ago. This is due to robust cheek teeth and mandibular bodies meant for attachment of jaw muscles for powerful vertical biting forces.

From Early Homo

The faces of three early Homo species are different from australopiths. In early Homo, the face projection is much less, especially in the area below the nose called premaxillary region. Certain parts of their faces, like the areas around the nose, eyes, and cheekbones, tend to face more to the side than earlier australopiths.

When we look at early Homo erectus, its face is more similar to modern humans than to habilis or rudolfensis. It has a more upright face with a nose area that's pulled back and a noticeable bridge on the nose. It's worth noting that erectus also has a less robust jawbone compared to australopiths.

As Homo species evolved, they shifted to a diet involving softer foods, possibly including meat. This change, starting with early erectus, led to reduced facial size, indicating a decreased need for large cheek teeth and robust jaws. This shift may suggest early humans began preparing or tenderizing food, including meat, before consumption, influencing our evolutionary path.

 

Middle Pleistocene human species

During the Middle Pleistocene, Homo underwent evolutionary changes in Eurasia, sharing facial traits. These Middle Pleistocene hominins are potential ancestors of Homo sapiens. Identifying the last common ancestor is crucial, predating the modern human face emergence. The modern face, smaller and non-projecting, with no supraorbital structures or midfacial prognathism, gradually developed in Homo sapiens.

Genetic and morphological data suggest Homo sapiens likely originated in Africa, but modern face traits may have emerged elsewhere. Researchers focus on key features, especially the zygomaxillary region. In modern humans, the front part of the zygomatic bone is like a corner, forming a right angle with the centre of our face. Also, there's typically a hollow space below the eye, known as the canine fossa. These unique features contribute to the distinct shape of our faces.

Researchers examine if the last common ancestor's zygomaxillary region resembled modern humans, Neanderthals, or a mix. Homo heidelbergensis, a potential ancestor seems to lack these features in the zygomaxillary region. Homo antecessor challenges Heidelbergensis as the last common ancestor, showing sapiens-like facial features. Fossils suggest primitive Homo antecessor facial morphology existed in some late Chinese homo erectus and persisted in Homo sapiens in Africa but was likely lost in Heidelbergensis, rhodesiensis, and Neanderthals

Let's explore the changes in the human face over time and the possible reasons behind these adaptations.

The transition from Middle Pleistocene hominins to modern humans involved facial changes and gracilization. Adaptive explanations for these changes consider factors like respiratory and energetic demands, climatic adaptation, diet, and para-masticatory activity. Shared features in Heidelbergensis and Neanderthals, such as a large nasal cavity and midfacial configuration, suggest the reduction of the nasal cavity as a primary cause of midfacial reduction in modern humans.

Neanderthals exhibit distinctive facial features, including continuous upper jawbone growth resulting in a protruding face during adolescence. These traits raise questions about adaptation to extreme cold or genetic drift in small populations.

Factors Affecting Facial Changes

Facial reduction in modern humans, including brows, midfaces, and jaws, and the development of a chin, may be responses to altered jaw loading. Despite being less adapted to sustained chewing, modern humans show increased bite force compared to Middle Pleistocene hominins, potentially advantageous for fracturing hard objects. Human facial diversity exceeds that in other primates, influenced by genetic, climatic, and environmental factors.

Climatic conditions, especially in high-latitude populations, significantly impact facial morphology, affecting nasal dimensions and cavity projection. Cultural and social changes also contribute to facial evolution. The relative reduction in face size in modern humans is attributed to enhanced social tolerance, reduced androgen activity, and possibly gestural communication. Reduction in brow ridge size may enhance communication by enabling a broader range of social cues.

Predicting future evolution is challenging, given factors like industrialized diets impacting facial shape. While change is likely to continue, certain limitations, such as breathing requirements and jaw function, will influence the extent of future facial evolution. The human face will adapt as our species encounters new environmental, social, and cultural conditions, ensuring a continued evolutionary journey.

Leave a Comment:
Categories
Recent Blogs